Yes. Florida law allows you to recover damages even if you were partly at fault for a rear-end accident. Our state’s law allows you to seek compensation as long as you are not found to be more than 50% responsible for the crash.
This legal concept is called “modified comparative negligence.” Simply put, your final compensation award is reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you are found 10% at fault, your total damage recovery is reduced by 10%.
Fault in these situations is complicated, especially because there’s a common belief that the rear driver is always to blame. This is not always the case, and there are specific situations where the lead driver shares the blame, and a Tampa car accident lawyer can investigate the details and help you pursue fair compensation.
If you have questions about your specific rear-end accident, call us at (813) 445-8161.
Table of Contents
ToggleYou’re worried that because you might have done something wrong, maybe you were following a bit too closely, or looked away for a second, you’ve lost your right to any compensation. This is a common and understandable fear after any car accident, and it’s a feeling that keeps many people from exploring their options, which is why you need a car accident lawyer to review the facts and protect your ability to recover damages.
In some states, that fear would be completely justified. States with strict “contributory negligence” rules, like Virginia or North Carolina, bar you from recovering anything if you are found to be even 1% at fault. A single mistake, no matter how small, could mean you are left to handle all the medical bills and lost income on your own.
Florida’s system is different, and it’s designed for shared responsibility. The law that governs this is Florida Statutes § 768.81, which establishes our state’s “modified comparative negligence” standard. This approach acknowledges that few accidents are truly 100% one person’s fault.
A key component of this law is the 51% bar. You are eligible to recover damages as long as you are not found to be 51% or more at fault for the accident. If your portion of the blame is determined to be over 50%, you are barred from recovering any damages from the other party.
Our firm, Boohoff Law, P.A, manages these fault-sharing situations. We work to ensure that no more blame is placed on you than is fair, protecting your ability to claim compensation. We understand how to present evidence and argue against unfair allocations of fault.
In Florida, there is a legal shortcut known as a “rebuttable presumption of negligence,” which assumes the rear driver is at fault in a rear-end collision. The law presumes the rear driver wasn’t following at a safe distance or paying proper attention. This is why so many people believe that if you hit someone from behind, you are automatically to blame, no questions asked.
Successfully challenging this presumption is key to establishing shared fault and being able to recover damages. There are several recognized exceptions that shift a portion of the blame, or sometimes all of it, to the front driver. Some of the most common exceptions include:
Our role is to find evidence that supports one of these exceptions. At Boohoff Law, P.A., we review traffic camera footage, interview witnesses, and examine the police report to build a full picture of what happened.
Many rear-end accidents are not as straightforward as they seem. While the rear driver typically holds some responsibility, the actions of the lead driver play a large part in causing the crash. Here are some concrete examples of situations where the front driver is found partially at fault, and knowing what to do after a car accident injury can help you protect your rights and build a strong claim.
Brake checking is the act of intentionally and aggressively braking hard in front of another vehicle, often out of frustration or road rage. This is an act of aggressive driving. If a driver brake-checks you and causes a collision, they are held significantly at fault for creating a sudden and unnecessary hazard.
Florida law requires all vehicles to have functioning brake lights. These lights are the primary way you communicate your intention to slow down or stop to the driver behind you. If the driver in front of you had broken or non-functional lights, you had no visual warning. This is a clear and compelling reason for the lead driver to share in the fault.
Turn signals are another form of communication on the road. If a driver slows down abruptly to make a turn but fails to use their turn signal, they create a dangerous and unpredictable situation. Their failure to signal their intention directly contributes to a rear-end crash, and they may be held partially responsible.
In some situations, a lead driver might unexpectedly put their car in reverse. This happens at a traffic light if they’ve overshot the line, or more commonly in parking lots and driveways. If a driver reverses without warning and you do not have time to react, they would likely bear a significant portion of the fault for the collision, and getting a lawyer for a car accident can help you prove responsibility and pursue fair compensation.
When a driver pulls out from a side street, parking lot, or driveway directly into your path without leaving enough space for you to safely slow down, they create an immediate danger. Even though the impact may be to the rear of their vehicle, their unsafe entry into traffic is the root cause of the crash, and they are held partially or even fully responsible.
Distracted driving is a danger to all drivers on the road. If the lead driver was texting, eating, or otherwise not paying attention to the road, it may have caused them to stop erratically, drift, or make other unpredictable movements. Evidence of their distraction is used to argue that their negligence contributed to the accident.
After an accident, insurance adjusters and, if your case goes to trial, a jury will review all available evidence to piece together exactly how the accident happened. Their goal is to create a clear timeline of events and determine how the actions of each driver contributed to the outcome.
The evidence they rely on includes a variety of sources, each providing a different piece of the puzzle:
An insurance company’s goal is to protect its business interests. Their adjusters will conduct a thorough investigation, and they will look for any evidence that suggests you were partially to blame, as this reduces the amount they may have to pay, so contact a lawyer to protect your rights and fight for the full compensation you deserve.
Even with a percentage of fault assigned to you, you may still pursue the exact same types of damages as any other accident victim. The only difference is that the final monetary award will be reduced by your percentage of fault. Your right to be compensated for your losses remains intact, and strong evidence might help my car accident case by proving the full extent of those losses.
The damages available are typically broken down into two main categories:
These are the straightforward, calculable costs that have resulted from your accident. They include:
These damages are meant to compensate you for the non-financial ways the accident has affected your life. They are more subjective but just as real:
If you are found to be exactly 50% at fault, you may still recover 50% of your damages under Florida law. The 51% bar rule means you are only prevented from recovery if you are found to be more than 50% responsible for the accident.
You should report the accident to your insurance company factually and honestly, but you should avoid admitting fault or speculating about who is to blame. Stick to the known facts of what happened. An admission of fault is used against you, even if an investigation later shows the other driver was primarily responsible. Let the investigation process play out.
The statute of limitations for a general negligence claim, such as a car accident, is now two years from the date of the crash in Florida. This deadline was changed from four years in March 2023, which makes it urgent to speak with an attorney and act promptly to protect your rights.
This situation involves both a personal injury claim against the at-fault driver and a workers’ compensation claim through your employer. The process is more complex, as these two types of claims have different rules and procedures. Legal guidance is necessary to manage both claims properly and ensure they work together for your benefit.
Florida’s no-fault system means your own Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage is your first source of payment for medical bills (up to $10,000), regardless of who was at fault.
To step outside the no-fault system and file a lawsuit against the other driver for further damages, such as pain and suffering, your injuries must meet a certain “serious injury” threshold. Once you meet that threshold, your percentage of fault will be applied to the damages you recover in that lawsuit as described above.
The laws around shared fault are complicated, but getting answers shouldn’t be. One phone call is enough to get started. We handle cases like yours throughout Florida and are ready to help.
If you’re ready to take the next step, call us for a free consultation at (813) 445-8161.
Free Consultation
We Are Here For You 24/7
“Really pleased with Boohoff Law! Received immediate responses when I had any questions. Treated amazingly by all staff … made this process a true breeze!”
We’re close by. And if you can’t make it to us, we’ll meet you where you need us, at home or in the hospital.
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
available 24/7
(877) 999-9999