If you suspect the driver was exhausted after a devastating collision with a large truck, contact a personal injury lawyer. When examining whether a trucking company is responsible for driver fatigue, the answer is usually. Companies are frequently liable when their tired drivers cause a wreck.
This responsibility arises from two main sources: their legal duty for their employees’ actions and their own direct negligence in putting a dangerous driver on the road. A truck accident lawyer investigates the corporate behavior that leads to these preventable tragedies.
Table of Contents
When a fatigued truck driver causes an accident, there are two primary ways a trucking company is held legally responsible. One path focuses on the employer-employee relationship. The other path examines the company’s own independent failures that endangered the public.
A thorough truck accident claim explores both avenues to establish accountability.
In most situations, an employer is legally responsible for the negligent actions of an employee on the job. This legal principle means that if a truck driver is a company employee, the company itself is automatically on the hook for a crash the driver causes. The driver’s fatigue becomes the company’s liability.
The company doesn’t have to have done anything wrong itself for this to apply. The driver’s mistake, made while working for the company, is legally seen as the company’s mistake. A lawyer works to establish the employment relationship to connect the driver’s negligence directly to the corporation.
A trucking company can also be held accountable for its own direct negligence. This happens when the company’s own decisions, policies, or failures contributed to the crash. In these cases, the focus is on the corporation’s wrongdoing, independent of the driver’s errors.
Direct negligence is about the company’s choices back at the corporate office. These choices created the dangerous situation that led to your injuries. A claim based on direct negligence seeks to hold the company accountable for its own poor judgment and reckless disregard for safety.
Trucking companies are frequently liable in fatigue-related crashes, but not always. If the truck driver was off duty or acting outside the scope of their employment at the time of the crash, the company may avoid liability.
For example:
If the company can show it complied with all safety regulations, and there is no evidence that fatigue played a role, it may escape liability.
Even if the driver was fatigued, a company may not be liable if it took reasonable steps to prevent such risks and had no reason to suspect anything was wrong.
For example:
If another driver caused the accident and the fatigued trucker had little or no opportunity to avoid it, the trucking company might not be held responsible. In such situations, the driver’s fatigue may have no bearing on the actual cause of the crash.
Instead, the fault could lie entirely with a third party, such as a speeding car, a distracted driver, or a reckless motorcyclist.
The federal government sets strict safety rules to combat the known danger of tired truck drivers. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) creates these regulations to protect everyone on the road. The most important of these are the Hours-of-Service (HOS) rules.
HOS regulations are the bedrock of truck safety. They’re not suggestions; they’re the law. These rules limit how many hours a commercial driver operates a truck in a day and in a week, and they mandate specific off-duty rest periods.
The sole purpose of these rules is to prevent fatigue-related crashes. When a company encourages or allows a driver to violate these rules, it’s a clear sign of negligence.
A deep dive into whether a company respects or ignores these federal mandates is a key part of any truck accident investigation. Violating these rules is strong evidence of a company prioritizing profits over people.
A tired driver is often a symptom of a sick company culture. Trucking companies, through their actions or inactions, frequently create the very conditions that lead to driver fatigue. This corporate negligence takes many forms, all of which put the public at unacceptable risk.
Here are common ways trucking companies are responsible for driver fatigue:
Proving that a trucking company is responsible for driver fatigue requires more than just pointing fingers. A lawyer must gather specific, robust evidence that exposes the company’s negligence. Trucking companies often hold this evidence, which must be demanded immediately after a crash.
A lawyer acts quickly to preserve and obtain this data:
Trucking companies often try to avoid responsibility by classifying their drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. They argue that the company isn’t responsible for the driver’s negligent acts because the driver isn’t an employee.
This is a common legal tactic designed to shield the corporation from liability. A skilled personal injury lawyer knows how to fight this defense. They investigate the true nature of the driver’s relationship with the company.
Even if a driver is labeled a contractor, a lawyer shows how the company still exercised significant control over the driver’s work, making them function like an employee. A company also remains directly liable for its own negligence in hiring an unsafe contractor.
Taking on a massive trucking corporation requires a legal team with the experience, resources, and determination to level the playing field. An attorney’s job is to systematically uncover the truth and hold the company fully accountable for its role in causing the crash.
Time is of the essence. A lawyer immediately sends a legal notice, called a spoliation letter, to the trucking company, demanding that they preserve all evidence of the crash. This stops the company from “losing” or destroying critical data like ELD records or dispatch communications.
A lawyer looks beyond just your accident. They investigate the company’s overall safety record, looking for patterns of HOS violations, past accidents, and other safety failures.
Proving that your crash was part of a larger corporate pattern of disregarding safety is evidence of direct negligence.
Proving a trucking company’s fault often requires the testimony of qualified experts. A lawyer hires trucking industry safety consultants to analyze the evidence and explain to a jury how the company violated federal regulations.
They may also use accident reconstructionists to show exactly how the fatigue-related crash occurred.
Trucking companies and their insurers have teams of aggressive lawyers whose only job is to minimize payouts. Your lawyer becomes your champion, managing all communications and fighting back against their intimidation tactics.
The driver is liable for their personal negligence in choosing to operate a truck while fatigued. The trucking company’s liability is broader; it’s responsible for its drivers’ actions (as the employer) and for its own direct negligence, such as pressuring drivers, failing to train them, or ignoring safety rules.
A personal injury lawyer can help you file a claim against all negligent parties.
Be extremely cautious of a fast settlement offer from a trucking company’s insurer. It’s a common tactic used to resolve a case for a fraction of its true value before you know the full extent of your injuries and long-term costs.
It’s best not to accept an offer until you have reached Maximum Medical Improvement and all the evidence has been gathered. A lawyer can advise you on all offers.
Even if the paper or electronic logbook appears to be in compliance, a skilled lawyer digs deeper. They compare the logbook data to other evidence like fuel receipts, GPS data from the truck, and cell phone records.
These other sources may reveal that the logbook was falsified to conceal violations of the Hours-of-Service rules.
You have the right to seek compensation for all your losses, including economic damages like your past and future medical bills, all lost income, and diminished earning capacity.
You can also seek payment for non-economic damages for your physical pain, emotional suffering, scarring, and loss of enjoyment of life.
A trucking company is still responsible because it has a legal duty to prevent its drivers from operating while fatigued. This duty includes properly training and supervising drivers, setting realistic schedules, and using electronic data to detect HOS violations.
A company that creates an environment where tired driving is encouraged or tolerated is directly negligent, regardless of the driver’s final choice.
A trucking corporation’s negligence may have caused this devastation, but it doesn’t get the final say. With the help of a personal injury attorney, you have the right to expose the truth and demand justice from the powerful entities that put their profits ahead of your safety.
Holding them accountable is the first step toward rebuilding your life. Contact Boohoff Law, P.A. 24/7 at (813) 445-8161 for your free, confidential consultation.
Free Consultation
We Are Here For You 24/7
“Really pleased with Boohoff Law! Received immediate responses when I had any questions. Treated amazingly by all staff … made this process a true breeze!”
We’re close by. And if you can’t make it to us, we’ll meet you where you need us, at home or in the hospital.
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.
available 24/7
(877) 999-9999